Dear Members of the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors,
I write to reaffirm the gravity of the claims (Hart vs Mendocino; 25-cv-04501-RMI pending against Mendocino County and its agents, as detailed in my federal civil rights and ADA complaint. This case is supported by extensive documented evidence including court transcripts, video documentation, and signed witness statements—many from former employees of the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Department. These records provide a clear and compelling foundation for the claims asserted.
On June 13, 2025, I submitted a formal good-faith settlement offer to the defendants via certified mail. This proposal, which is included in the court record, reflects a principled effort to resolve this matter in accordance with judicial economy, restorative justice, and the peaceful resolution of disputes, as encouraged by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The settlement offer totals $750,000 and is contingent upon the adoption of critical institutional reforms aimed at addressing systemic deficiencies in the treatment of inmates with epilepsy and serious neurological conditions in Mendocino County correctional facilities. It also includes designated donations to national and regional epilepsy advocacy organizations and mandates the implementation of humane medical policies within the county jail system.
I respectfully reiterate my request that all records, including video evidence, be released to the public. Transparency is essential for accountability and public trust, especially given the severity of the documented abuses and neglect.
Beyond personal redress, my objective is to ensure lasting reforms within the Mendocino County jail system—particularly the adoption of improved protocols for the care and treatment of epileptic and medically vulnerable inmates.
Furthermore, I strongly urge the County to pursue recovery of damages through pension forfeiture of the employees found responsible for these violations. This measure would both help offset the County’s legal costs and send a clear message that such misconduct will not be tolerated.
I remain willing to engage constructively with all parties to bring this matter to an equitable resolution that advances justice, transparency, and meaningful institutional change.
Thank you for your careful consideration of these matters of public and legal significance.
Respectfully,
Joseph P. Hart
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:25-cv-04501-RMI
Dear Members of the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors,
I write to reaffirm the gravity of the claims (Hart vs Mendocino; 25-cv-04501-RMI pending against Mendocino County and its agents, as detailed in my federal civil rights and ADA complaint. This case is supported by extensive documented evidence including court transcripts, video documentation, and signed witness statements—many from former employees of the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Department. These records provide a clear and compelling foundation for the claims asserted.
On June 13, 2025, I submitted a formal good-faith settlement offer to the defendants via certified mail. This proposal, which is included in the court record, reflects a principled effort to resolve this matter in accordance with judicial economy, restorative justice, and the peaceful resolution of disputes, as encouraged by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The settlement offer totals $750,000 and is contingent upon the adoption of critical institutional reforms aimed at addressing systemic deficiencies in the treatment of inmates with epilepsy and serious neurological conditions in Mendocino County correctional facilities. It also includes designated donations to national and regional epilepsy advocacy organizations and mandates the implementation of humane medical policies within the county jail system.
I respectfully reiterate my request that all records, including video evidence, be released to the public. Transparency is essential for accountability and public trust, especially given the severity of the documented abuses and neglect.
Beyond personal redress, my objective is to ensure lasting reforms within the Mendocino County jail system—particularly the adoption of improved protocols for the care and treatment of epileptic and medically vulnerable inmates.
Furthermore, I strongly urge the County to pursue recovery of damages through pension forfeiture of the employees found responsible for these violations. This measure would both help offset the County’s legal costs and send a clear message that such misconduct will not be tolerated.
I remain willing to engage constructively with all parties to bring this matter to an equitable resolution that advances justice, transparency, and meaningful institutional change.
Thank you for your careful consideration of these matters of public and legal significance.
Respectfully,
Joseph P. Hart
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:25-cv-04501-RMI