Mendocino County
  • Sign In

Meeting: Board of Supervisors on 2020-06-16 9:00 AM - SPECIAL MEETING

Meeting Time: June 16, 2020 at 9:00am PDT

Agenda Item

6a) Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Recommendations of the Cannabis Cultivation Ad Hoc Committee (Sponsor: Cannabis Cultivation Ad Hoc Committee (Supervisor Haschak))

Legislation Text Legacy Table 3.9.2020 Non-Legacy Table 3.9.2020 06-05-20 Powell Correspondence 06-07-20 Lumpkin Correspondence 06-07-20 MCA Correspondence 06-07-20 Davis Correspondence 06-08-20 Clein Correspondence 06-08-20 Covelo Cannabis Advocacy Correspondence 06-09-20 Mendocino Cannabis Alliance Correspondence 2 06-09-20 Mendocino Cannabis Alliance Correspondence 06-09-20 Henry's Originals Correspondence 06-09-20 Leef Correspondence 06-09-20 MCFB Correspondence 06-09-20 Powell Correspondence 06-09-20 Willits Environmental Center Correspondence 6b 06-09-20 Fussell Correspondence 06-10-20 Pellar Correspondence 06-10-20 Ross Correspondence 06-10-20 de Vall Correspondence 06-10-20 Springer Correspondence 06-10-20 De Vall Correspondence 06-10-20 Springer Correspondence 06-15-20 Hensley Creek Holdings, Inc Correspondence 06-15-20 Jenkins Correspondence 06-15-20 Clifton Correspondence 06-15-20 Powell Correspondence 06-15-20 Denson Correspondence 06-16-20 Norris Correspondence 06-16-20 Miranda Correspondence 06-16-20 Roberts Correspondence DRAFT Mendocino County Cannabis 15168 Checklist 06-16-20 CCAG Correspondence 06-16-20 Drell Correspondence 06-16-20 Miranda Correspondence 06-16-20 Roberts Correspondence
   Oppose     Neutral     Support    
50000 of 50000 characters remaining
3 Public Comments
  • Default_avatar
    Paul Hansbury over 4 years ago

    Why can't the applicant self-certify for CEQA compliance?

  • Default_avatar
    Carol Boles over 4 years ago

    Dear Supervisors,
    I am not well versed in this arena but I have written two letters in the past to the county board of supervisors for which I have never gotten a response to which is saddening. Please delay approval for any changes to the cannabis ordinance so that there will be more time for the public to understand what direction this current ordinance is going, it is affecting everyone, especially people just trying to live as non growers in neighborhoods on residential rangeland.

  • Default_avatar
    Sandra Hognestad over 4 years ago

    It appears that the request for this re-direction is an attempt to circumvent the delay that was approved May 9th. To completely re-direct the program and allow it to be controlled by "The State" and abandon the many hours of work spent on the existing program is ridiculous. It should be controlled by the local government that we vote for. The intent to allow Parallel Tracks for Rangeland continues the confusion and doesn't make the ordinance better. This should not be considered, just fix it.